The Beatles: ‘Now And Then’ and in the end, the love you make

The other day I woke up, fell out of bed, and listened to a new Beatles song. 

“Now And Then” is being billed as the “last Beatles song,” and with Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr now well into their 80s, it probably is the final time we can say that. Resurrected from John Lennon’s demos circa 1977 and mixed with some George Harrison 1990s guitar thanks to some very fancy technology, here we have all four Beatles, two long gone, together again in a Frankenstein miracle of technology and persistence.

But is it any good? We live in a world of boundless hype and unnecessary reboots, constantly perched on the edge of expected disappointment, and yet, “Now And Then” is a beautiful, fragile thing that I can’t quite get out of my head. 

Of course, it’s the Beatles, so the song has been swamped with an avalanche of merchandise, fiery hot takes and analyses just like this one. All the to-do threatens to overwhelm what is at its heart a delicate, sweet little song. 

Like two other Lennon demos “Free As A Bird” and “Real Love” that were revived for the 1995 Beatles Anthology series, it’s Lennon during his domestic hiatus, writing simple, basic lyrics about home and happiness with none of the surrealist whimsy or angry edge that marked his top Beatles works. So it’s flimsy, sure.

And yet, and yet, I can’t listen to it without feeling a swell of emotion. The Beatles ultimately have always made me happy whether it’s the spunky energy of “Love Me Do” or the psychedelic swirl of “I Am The Walrus.” A Beatles song makes me glad to be here in this world, whether it’s a pop song, a sad song or an awfully sappy song (sorry, “Let It Be.”) 

The lonesome piano chords that kick off “Now And Then” give the song an elegiac feel, and Lennon’s ghostly voice is mournfully hushed. It could be a dirge, and I’m sure some folks see it that way, but I look at it as a fond farewell. 

To hear Paul’s 81-year-old voice kicking in to harmonise with Lennon, dead now for more years than he was alive, is to feel the endless pull of time itself. 

Sir Peter Jackson’s video for the song is faintly ridiculous at first, with macabre mixing of young John and George into footage of aged Paul and Ringo, old and young Beatles capering about, but it’s also a little charming and silly, as Beatlemania always was.

 “And if I make it through,” John sings, and you know, in the end, we all hope for that, don’t we? We keep the people that leave us with us, as long as we’re here. Paul has made a love letter to the past, out of the fragments of his dead friends’ leavings, and sure, it’s big business and all, but it’s also the Beatles. I cannot surrender my love of the Beatles to the binary “like/dislike” button and algorithm. I’m simply grateful for whatever we get. 

At the end of Jackson’s video we see those young, gorgeous Beatles on stage taking a bow, then slowly fading from the scene. You’ve got to have a hard heart not to feel something then. One day far too soon for any of us, there will be no more Beatles.

“Now And Then” is raw sentiment and lacking the mad fire of invention that made the Beatles change the world, true, but I kind of love it all the same. Yeah, yeah, yeah. 

Meanwhile, elsewhere on the internet…

Over in the bustling world of freelance journalism, I’ve got two new pieces out there this week!

At Radio New Zealand, I dug into the hip world of used book fairs like this past week’s GABBS 24 Hour Fair, where hundreds of folks pack stadiums in search of everything from Lee Child to Shakespeare at bargain prices. Finally, I have weaponised my own addiction to buying books into freelance material!

You can read the full story here: Why New Zealand is still in love with used book fairs

Meanwhile, over at the New Zealand Listener magazine, my latest book review published there in this week’s Nov. 11-17 issue is a scary thing indeed – a look at a fascinating study of fear, Fear: An Alternate History of the World by Robert Peckham.

You can read it in the issue on newsstands now throughout the great land of New Zealand, if you’re lucky enough to be here, or it can be found online right here (Paywall).

Keeping It Short Week, Day 7: The impeccable heartbreak of Douglas Sirk

It’s the grand conclusion of Keeping It Short Week, 250 words per post no matter what!

Melodrama is fundamentally uncool. When you think of the word, you think of overwrought tears, exaggerated gesture, implausible goings-on and a story that attempts to throttle your feelings. 

Yet sometimes, we all want to get swept away a bit. Sometimes we just want to feel. And when I crave a bit of melodrama, I’ll skip your soap operas and Jane Austen and go right for the straight stuff – the Sirk. 

Douglas Sirk is here to wring your emotions out like a wet dishcloth. His handful of shimmering colour movies are glittering gems of 1950s restraint, heartbreak and bombast. If you can overlook their more dated aspects, you’ll find some smart, subtle criticisms of privilege, power and wealth that don’t seem all that out of place in 2023. 

Watching gems like All That Heaven Allows or Written On The Wind is like viewing a lush painting coming to life. His frequent star and muse Rock Hudson, a closeted gay man, brings a lot of hefty subtext to his presence in Sirkland. It’s impossible to say how this much colours our impression of him in these movies, but in them he combines the chiseled handsomeness of a Cary Grant with a slightly fragile, insecure veneer. In Sirkland, his characters are all taut with suppressed emotion, and through their fumblings, we learn a little something about our own. 

Oh, and Sirk apparently liked to call his movies “dramas of swollen emotion”, which is way better than melodramas. 

Thanks for reading along this “short” week of posts, I hope we’ve all had life changing lessons as a result. Normal long-winded posting will resume next week!

Keeping It Short Week, Day 6: Still can’t figure out if I love or hate The Doors

Hey, groovy cats, we’re still in Keeping it Short Week, each post 250 words or your money back:

Everyone has bands they love, but what about the ones you kind of love and don’t love? The Doors and Jim Morrison hold a very singular place in my tastes.

I’ve owned their albums and CDs multiple times and then gone through a phase of being so over the Doors that they went… well, out the door. I felt sometimes like being a Doors fan over the age of 21 was embarrassing. The anguished “Mother/Father” oedipal stuff in “The End” is a prime example of how the Doors could swing from ominous to awful in the space of a few lines. 

Morrison was, by all reports, a fairly reprehensible human being in a lot of ways, and his sexist stoned messiah complex wears thin fast. How we feel about an artist as a person can affect how you view their work, and that’s not cancel culture, it’s just being a human. 

And yet, I still find myself humming along to the Doors. They were pompous, overwrought, exciting and ridiculous all at the same time. A broody epic like “Riders on the Storm” still gets me, while trippy psych-rock like “Light My Fire” and “People Are Strange” are both timeless and time capsules of what we think the ‘60s meant. 

Maybe I overthink The Doors, and in the end they were just a solid rock band with a tendency towards bad poetry. But for a band I sometimes hate, I sure end up going back to them an awful lot. 

Keeping It Short Week, Day 5: Creepshow and why short horror still creeps me out

Bwa-ha-ha, it’s still Keeping It Short Week, every post 250 words or less or else:

I took years to actually see horror movie anthology Creepshow when it came out in 1982. I first saw the graphic novel adaptation by the late great Bernie Wrightson in a shop, but as a wee pre-teen I was too scared to buy it, so I’d end up flipping through the pages every time I went to that store, scared stiff. 

Creepshow is a great little mix of gore and cheese, filtered through the sensibility of ‘50s horror comics like EC’s Tales From The Crypt. Throw together a few segments, toss in a cackling host to link them together, and off you go. The beauty of an anthology format is, if you don’t like the current bit, wait a few minutes for the next. 

Horror seems to lend itself to an anthology format more than any genre, really. Much of my favourite horror is short and (not so) sweet – those EC comics, TV series like Black Mirror and The Twilight Zone, Stephen King’s deliciously nasty short stories. 

My favourite Universal Horror movies from the 1930s-1940s rarely hit more than an hour’s length, a lesson to those who think you always need three hours-plus to tell a story. Bride of Frankenstein is a mere 75 minutes long! 

Horror can be longer format, of course, such as many of King’s hefty doorstop books like It. But for me, the best horror hits you hard and quick, leaving you gasping for breath before you even quite clock that it’s over. 

Happy Halloween! 

Keeping It Short Week, Day 4: Matthew Perry and the spiky heart of ‘Friends’

It’s still Keeping It Short Week, with every post 250 words or less:

I wouldn’t say I was a huge Friends fan … and yet, I watched nearly all of its 236 episodes.

It was in the air in the 1990s, a candy-coloured fantasy of twentysomething life. It began in 1994 just a few weeks after I spent a pinched, impoverished summer living in New York City, and its sitcom world of waitresses and unemployed actors living in luxurious lofts was not reality to me. 

Still, Friends was diverting and served up an image of life as breezy comic fun, and honestly, the main reason I ended up watching as much as I did was always Matthew Perry’s sarcastic Chandler Bing, the prickly joker in the deck of shiny gorgeous faces. When Perry died this weekend at just 54, it stung. He was my favourite Friend, the one I could most imagine having a beer with, in many ways the most human of the lot. 

The wisecracking guy was already a well-worn sitcom trope when Perry came along, but he added a bit of Gen-X irreverence to Chandler. Sure, he had the same romantic misadventures as the rest of the Friends, but Perry added a slight wink to the role. “Could this be any more cliched,” you could almost hear him saying. 

In real life Perry was battling addiction for years and maybe, just maybe, those inner turmoils gave him a little more weight in the role of Chandler. The joker jokes to keep the tears from coming, you see. 

Keeping It Short Week, Day 3: Why Mystery Science Theater 3000 is still the best comfort food

Hey hey, it’s still Keeping It Short Week, no posts longer than 250 words:

I heard of Mystery Science Theater 3000 long before I saw it, this obscure cable TV show that screened old terrible movies with robots making fun of them. 

I finally saw it in, of all places, a hotel room in Florida. I clearly remember one movie was the Soviet fantasy Jack Frost. It was the damn weirdest, funniest thing I’d ever seen. 

But boy, was it hard to actually watch more. It aired on cable channels I didn’t have money to watch, or weren’t carried locally. I finally found a few VHS tapes, and then DVDs, but even then, they were hard to find or crazy expensive. They were like buried treasure for quip-happy trash film fans. MST3K made me realise just how many awful, hilarious obscure movies there are in the universe. 

It’s all much easier now to watch MTS3K, thanks to the internet. A couple of times a year I get into a real MST3K mood and binge away. For days, I keep imagining myself as Tom Servo or Crow, yelling stupid stuff as life goes by me. Before hateful trolls took over pop culture, MST3K was good-hearted snark. 

I do miss the hunt. Kids today have no idea how hard it once was to find things you’d heard about that sounded cool. I can watch any episode of MST3K I want with a few clicks now, and I love them, but part of me misses the mystery part of that theater. 

Keeping It Short Week, Day 2: Who’s my favourite superhero?

It’s Keeping It Short Week, 250 words or bust:

The question is fraught with peril for any comics nerd: Who’s your favourite superhero?

I’ve clearly got too much time on my hands because I think about this a lot. One of the first comics I ever remember reading was Amazing Spider-Man #200 and for years Spider-Man, web-swinging worrywart, was my choice. He was a geeky teenager and then a harried student! I identified!

For a brief while I succumbed to the bristly charms of mutant Wolverine, before overexposure and dire 1990s comics ended that affair. Then for a long time, I’d go with Batman, because pound for pound I think he’s probably had the most great stories written about him of any superhero. 

There’s others I adore, of course, like the endless duelling personalities of the Hulk, angst-ridden Daredevil, lumpy everyman The Thing

Yet, these days, when I think of the superhero I dig the most, it’s always the most basic – Superman, the Man of Steel. He may be uncool compared to edgy Punishers and Spawns but honestly, the older I get, the more I like his fundamental decency.

I love lots of superheroes, but when it comes down to it, the one I’d really like to see in our troubled old world, the role model – well, Superman was the first for a reason. He’s also still kind of the best. I’m old now, and superheroes don’t just have to be cool to me. They have to actually be kind of super, too. 

Keeping It Short Week, Day 1: In which I attempt to write less words

If there’s one problem the internet gives writers, it’s the lack of the end of a page. I constantly have a problem with keeping my blog posts short. Thus, as an experiment, it’s time for Keeping It Short Week, where I attempt to make my point without banging on for 1500 words. 

Yessir, 250 words or less, that’s my motto for the next seven days. It’s also a clever attempt to clear out my “blog drafts” folder which has stacked up a bit with half-assembled fragments of hot takes over the five years I’ve been doing this website

I left the hellsite that was once Twitter a year or so ago and have few regrets about it, except for one thing – sometimes it’s fun to write something concise and witty and then move on, and the endless trolling and hate speech kind of obscured that. 

My role model in all things brevity is old mate Bob from Temuka who somehow manages to post almost every single day and raise small humans, and for the most part, keeps his posts about half as windy as mine are. 

Writing short is good training for the brains, too, and something I generally manage in my paying journalism work. The freedom of the internet is great, but sometimes, a little discipline is good too. 

So, onwards, for a week of brief surveys of topics that are of interest to me! And if I happen to go past 250 words well then I’ll just 

To be Frank: Richard Ford and the life of Frank Bascombe

Over four novels and one collection of short stories, for nearly 40 years Richard Ford has spun out the life story of Frank Bascombe, New Jersey deep thinker father and husband.

Starting in 1986 with The Sportswriter and carrying on over the decades with Independence Day (which won him the 1996 Pulitzer Prize), The Lay Of The Land and the collection Let Me Be Frank With You, he now wraps up the series with this year’s splendid Be Mine. 

It’s kind of the last gasp of a genre that feels rooted to the 20th century – multi-novel sagas about fairly well-off white men and their disenchantment in the American century, as pioneered by John Updike, Philip Roth and others. It’s kind of soap-opera literary fiction, really – the ups and downs of a life chronicled over several books, waiting to see what became of this supporting character or that one, to see how your everyman character views life’s latest changes and outrages. 

Frank Bascombe begins the series as a man in his late thirties, recently divorced and mourning his firstborn son, dead of a rare disease at age 9. We follow him through career changes, battling cancer, his feuds and fancies, and like Updike’s soaring Rabbit Angstrom series, by the end of hundreds and hundreds of pages of one man’s life you feel like a little part of it includes you. 

We mark the years in pages – early on the series finds Frank, a lifelong Democrat, pushing for quixotic Mike Dukakis and ends with him observing with disdain Trump’s “swollen, eyes-bulging face”, “looking in all directions at once, seeking approval but not finding enough.”

I recently re-read all four Bascombe books before the heartbreakingly good new Be Mine, and the experience leaves you “dreamy,” to use one of Ford’s favourite self-descriptions of Frank, lost in the confusing world of being human. 

They’re worth revisiting – a tour of the last 35 years of American ennui, as Bascombe meanders from a sleepy sportswriting career to a real estate agent, fumbles through a second marriage and his uncertain ties with his ex-wife, surviving son and daughter and various friends, neighbours and enemies. Not a lot “happens” in the Bascombe books, with their series of errands, job tasks and family check-ins, always linked to some holiday such as Thanksgiving, Christmas or the Fourth of July – but Ford’s patient, precise writing slowly settles us into Frank’s world view, as he navigates from a nearly 40-year-old to a senior citizen. 

Bascombe is an overthinker, a ponderer, and while this often makes for some lovely thought-provoking prose, Ford is smart enough to also recognise this is a weakness in Frank. Again and again, we find Frank thrown into situations where he loses his temper or acts impulsively and foolishly, like all of us do at times, and this has the effect of reminding us that much of Frank’s musing is just that – words to cover up the fact that often most of us never quite know what we’re doing. That makes him far more relatable as a character. 

Yes, the books are all very much told from the eye of the “privileged” – Frank’s encounters with those of different races or poorer backgrounds are often awkward, occasionally a bit condescending, even if he ultimately means well. Yet Frank’s voice counts too, in the ultimate arithmetic of things. Much of the series is taken up with his fumbling attempts to define and find happiness in his life, like it is for us all.

The books can be imperfect – sometimes suffer from a sense of bloat, with too many long rambling passages describing New Jersey landscapes, yet Ford often manages a kind of hypnotic effect. Some of it ages badly, like Ford having Frank use the phrase “Negro” a lot to describe Black characters in earlier books – already painfully outdated language in 1986. While most of the books end with a bit of “action” and forward motion, a jarringly inexplicable scene of violence that closes The Lay Of The Land sticks out like a sore thumb in this otherwise meticulously crafted series. 

For me, the relationship between Frank and his awkward, cranky surviving son Paul is the highlight of the books, and their unpredictable energy gives the series a welcome jolt of tension – as ruminative as Frank is about life, he’s always being thrown off his game by his irreverent, cynical and odd son. It’s perhaps telling that the two best books, to me, Independence Day and Be Mine, foreground Frank and Paul’s dynamic. 

And that’s what makes Be Mine hit me so hard, as it’s the story of a quixotic final road trip to Mount Rushmore Frank Bascombe takes with Paul, 47, who has been diagnosed with ALS and is fading fast. Far closer to the end of his life and at the end of his son’s, Frank is still the same overthinking, dreamy fellow he’s always been, but there is a taut new sadness to his circumstances, and a gorgeous melancholy that makes Be Mine sting a little. We started the series with Frank mourning one son, and finish it with another about to go. 

“Just exactly what that good life was – the one I expected – I cannot tell you now exactly, though I wouldn’t say it has not come to pass, only that much has come in between,” Frank says in the very first page of The Sportswriter, and almost 40 years later at the conclusion of Be Mine, the same man notes, “I have discovered that my narrative, to my surprise, is not a sad man’s narrative, not resigned, in spite of events.”

This, perhaps, is the best we can hope for, Ford tells us, in his brilliant series of novels.