In defense of Mississippi, the place where I became a writer

When talking to people, it doesn’t take long before I get asked where I’m from. My thudding American accent, still firmly attached after nearly 20 years in New Zealand, gives it away.

“California,” I’ll usually say, which will typically bring up talk of Hollywood, skiing, surfing, Disneyland, or all of the above.

But I’m also from Mississippi, which often gets a very different reaction when I say that – a slight twist of the lip, widening of the eyes. Mississippi is a word which feels haunted, slippery with meaning. There’s no more evocative American state name, with all that entails. 

I visited Mississippi last month for the first time since 1999. It seemed much further from New Zealand than California where most of my family and friends live, and yet in the last year or two I’ve had a hankering to see those Southern skies again, to visit the friends and relatives still scattered around Mississippi, to get back in touch with a important chapter of my life that had started to seem so very distant. 

The roots of my family run deep there. My grandparents and great-grandparents are buried there, in a quiet cemetery tucked away down shadowy side roads. 

I lived there myself from the ages of 18 to 25, from a freshman in college to a fumbling young working journalist. It’s a formative time in anyone’s life when you start to figure out who you’ll be. 

Oxford, Mississippi is where I became a writer, where I went from being one of those people who’d talk about being a writer to someone who actually got paid cash money for stringing words together. I was a performative oddball California kid dropped into the Deep South. 

At Ole Miss, the University of Mississippi, I discovered more than the science fiction and fantasy that marked an awful lot of my reading through high school. My professors introduced me to everyone from James Baldwin to John Updike to Donna Tartt to Flannery O’Connor. I read widely, Southern lit and non-Southern lit. I wrote for a daily newspaper for the first time and I had my first paying journalism jobs there, and began avidly scribbling comic books and even a daily comic strip on the side. 

When I lived in Oxford in the 1990s I was at the end of eras, although I didn’t know it. Stark, raw Delta bluesmen like RL Burnside and Junior Kimbrough would play to beer-addled frat boys, who didn’t know or care they were the last of their kind. At the local townie bar City Grocery, whiskey-soaked writing legends like Willie Morris, Larry Brown and Barry Hannah would hold court – they’re all gone now, memorialised by little bronze plaques on the bar. I took Hannah’s short story class at Ole Miss and churned out some pretty godawful tales before I realised journalism and comics were probably more my speed than great Southern literature. 

With my good old Oxford friends Bruce and Rebecca in Oxford, Mississippi, August 2026.

This year, I had a wonderful time returning catching up with old friends, mentors and co-workers, and despite the nearly 30 years that had passed in some ways it felt like yesterday that I had sat at the bars, that I’d browsed at Square Books and coffee’d up at Bottletree Bakery. Mississippi is a hell of a fun place, really.

But of course, it’s also full of shadows. 

Every place on Earth has a tragic past if you dig far enough, but Mississippi is unique in its stains and glories. I can think of nowhere else I’ve lived where the absolute worst and the shining best of a place are so deeply intertwined, where one seemingly cannot exist without the other. 

The horrors that were visited on the Black population in the 20th century still turn my stomach, the suppression, cruelty and casual dehumanisation. The story of Emmett Till – a 14-year-old boy tortured and murdered by white racists in 1955 for allegedly daring to whistle at a white woman – is as good as any to illustrate how horrible things could get.

My mother was just about the same age as Till and lived an hour or two away from where his blood was spilled. But she knew nothing about it at the time, until many years later when the story began to seep out into the wider culture. I often think about this, the two people of similar ages and totally, totally different worlds. The South endlessly romanticises itself, which can create both great stories and cover up hard truths. 

White Mississippian Wright Thompson, in The Barn, his masterful analysis of the Till killing, what led to it and the long suppression of it in history, tries to unpack the mysteries of an atrocity.

He writes that the more he looked at Till’s 1955 death, “the more I understood that the tragedy of humankind isn’t that sometimes a few depraved individuals do what the rest of us could never do. It’s that the rest of us hide those hateful things from view.” 

And yet, from that bloody soil has sprouted the seeds of change and art. Coming back to Mississippi, I felt loved by the Southern charm, the humidity and weedy kudzu (an invasive vine) carpeting everything, and the stories everywhere, the stories that inspired me and so many others. So much fine art and literature comes from there – William Faulkner, Richard Wright, Tennessee Williams, younger folk like Jonathan Miles and Kiese Laymon, music from Elvis to BB King that changed the world.

The best of its authors are constantly questioning Mississippi, instead of glorifying some lost cause endlessly. “Mississippi’s not an easy place to love,” Ralph Eubanks writes in Ever Is A Long Time, his excellent, deeply thoughtful memoir of growing up Black in small-town Mississippi and learning how the government actively spied on Black citizens. 

A place can have a terrible past and yet still have things to admire and love; in our everything-is-good-or-evil digital world that stokes perpetual outrage, it can be hard to explain a place that is full of troubles and pain, and still working hard to be better, and can be full of kindness, hospitality and talent. Mississippi is complicated. Isn’t everywhere?

“It is not hard to understand the fierce chauvinism of Mississippi patriots,” the late Stanley Booth wrote in his book of essays on Southern music, Rythm Oil. “To stay there, you would have to convince yourself you loved it.”

My time at Ole Miss in the 1990s was marked with endless wrestling over race in what we’d now call “culture wars” – over whether the anthem “Dixie” was racist, over the university’s white throwback plantation owner mascot Colonel Reb, over the Black editors at the Daily Mississippian and the waving of the Rebel Confederacy flag. It draws a fierce pride and at times defensiveness – lord knows I’ve had to defend Mississippi some over the years against the statements of people who’ve never been there. 

The Mississippi I visited last month felt like it was inching forward still with reconciling that past – the campus of Ole Miss was now dotted with prominent signs about the historic racial terror, and the looming town courthouse, as Southern an icon as it gets, now also features an account of the lynchings in Lafayette County. A monument to James Meredith, who became the first Black student at Ole Miss after bloody, fatal protests in 1962, now stands proudly beside the campus library.  It says “courage,” in bold letters.

Faulkner famously said “The past is never dead. It’s not even past,” and while that’s slipped into the realm of cliche, that’s still as Mississippi a thought as you can get. 

Despite what some folks running the country these days like to think, coming to grips honestly with the past doesn’t make you weaker. It takes, like the Meredith monument says, courage.

“Confronting its many imperfections, rather than hiding from them, makes it easier to love,” Eubanks writes. 

I’d much rather have a Mississippi that accepts and interrogates its past, rather than longs for imagined perfect glory days. I lived in Mississippi, loved a lot about it, grimaced at some things, and learned so very much about stories, writing and myself that I was happy to revisit for a few sultry August days and nights.

It is still not quite like anywhere else I’ve ever lived, and I don’t think I’d be the person I am today without a little Mississippi in my blood. 

It was 25 years ago today – One journalist’s 9/11 memories

Twenty-five years ago this morning, I was eating scrambled eggs and bacon at a Rotary Club breakfast meeting in Northern California when everything went upside-down. 

There was a TV playing the early shows there in a corner of the room, and suddenly everyone was paying attention to that. I wasn’t sure why, but then I saw skyscrapers in flames in Manhattan, and even as the editor then of a tiny little weekly mountain town newspaper, I knew my job had just changed. 

Pretty much nobody over 30 will have direct memory of that day now – how has it been 25 years? – but my primary recollections of that time is how impotent we all felt. 

Something that’s hard for people to get now is that nobody knew anything for those first days. As with any mass casualty incident even now, it can take a while for details to come out, something we really chafe against in our I-want-it-all-now 24-hour news cycle. There were rumours other world cities were being attacked, there were tales of 50,000 dead. For a few shaky days, it seemed like anything could happen. 

Truckee, California was far, far away from the epicentre of the day, but I scurried back to the Sierra Sun offices where one of those absurdly tiny mobile TVs was scrounged up because we knew we had to do something that day. It barely got reception, and we balanced it on one shelf with the antennas pointing out the window and could fuzzily see a tired and strained Peter Jennings seriously narrating the news, grainy images of huge explosions that didn’t seem possible. 

The limitations of the era were clear to me – my small staff of reporters kept clicking refresh on the news websites of the time, but everything kept crashing. We listened to National Public Radio, to find out what we could. Nobody was posting on TikTik or Facebook then, of course, and only a few early primitive blogs could be found with tales of the day. 

America was so sheltered from the kind of sudden violence so much of the rest of the world had experienced through the 20th century – and still does today. In our blinkered innocence it felt like we were somehow special, which of course was wrong.

The one image that haunted me the most is the one of the second jet hitting the World Trade Center, hurtling in oh so very, very fast and just slamming into the building and through it. The speed! In an accident it would probably be slowed down some, but the total speed and deliberateness of it as it plunged through the building – unreal. 

Nobody knew what was really going on, a terrible place for a journalist to be. I trashed the plans for whatever we were leading with in that week’s paper and my reporters bashed out quick reactions from locals, about what the local airport was doing, and tried to capture a moment in time that felt impossible to capture. 

Paranoia was firmly in the air for months, years afterwards. There was the brief terrifying anthrax scare where even the smallest of post offices around America would freak out over the tiniest hint of white powder. 

I still remember this gem from one of the Tahoe papers at the time:

“Inside city limits, a man on Capistrano Avenue called police Saturday night after he noticed a white substance inside a newly opened roll of toilet paper. It turned out to be lint from the paper, said South Lake Tahoe Police Officer Brian Williams.”

It was a very different media world then – we barely had email, social media wasn’t a thing and we were still in the age when you often waited for news to be served to you, on the 6pm news or the comforting thwapp of the morning newspaper delivery. Headline news was a luxury for those with cable TV. I only bought my first cell phone – a chunky Nokia – after the attacks, when the idea of being able to get in touch with your loved ones instantly suddenly seemed a lot more important. 

Flags sprouted everywhere in the days after – hanging from buildings, flapping from awnings, attached to car antennas. Again, nobody knew what was going to happen next, a feeling I’ve only truly encountered a few times in the decades since.

It was the end of something and the beginning of something that I honestly think we’re still not through yet on this ever-turning globe. Twenty-five years from today, I guess I’ll be an old man. I wonder what the world will look like then. 

• Meanwhile, over at the day job for RNZ, I’ve written two long pieces looking in-depth about how 9/11 affected life here in New Zealand — go give them a read if you like!

Explainer: How 9/11 changed how we fly in New Zealand forever

Explainer: How did the 9/11 attacks change New Zealand?

The Internet 2026, or, why even bother with this stuff?

So, I’ve been wondering whether or not it’s even worth it. 

I took a little hiatus from blogging back in June, as I had a lot of life stuff going on, but it also gave me a little chance to pause and try and figure out what my place is in this great churning, gurning algorithmic content machine most of us are caught inside these days. 

To tell the truth, I’ve gotten a little discouraged in the last 12 months or so. As someone who makes a living writing words for fun and profit, the rise of generative AI, the ongoing social media-fuelled breakdown in polite society, the daily doomscrolling and the hourly outrage alerts have started to make it all feel quite futile. There’s too much of everything and not enough of something, and it kind of feels like we’ve all developed a case of Ren and Stimpy’s space madness, doesn’t it? Do my little words even matter?

There’s a lot of nostalgia for the pre-collapse internet era out there these days. Like a lot of people, I got mesmerised by the shiny town squares of MySpace and Facebook and Twitter back in the day, sharing all kinds of random babble and life moments that I’d be truly embarrassed to do now. Again, like a lot of people, I’m a lot more cautious now about my online life, what I say and what I share. I begrudgingly still use Facebook (honestly, when you live on the other side of the world from a lot of your friends and family, it still has its uses), I abandoned Twitter years ago when the Nazis took over and find most other sites incredibly irritating (the various Twitter replacements) or full of stupidity (hello, Reddit). 

These days, many of the spaces I used to go to online just make me feel sad, mad, or bad. 

I started this website all the way back in 2018 when I was at a bit of a creative slump in life, mired in journalism jobs that weren’t really fulfilling and needing a bit more of an outlet. I could write about anything and everything I wanted here, and it spurred me to stretch my brain a little more.

It’s been a good impetus – I’ve ended up migrating in my work to doing far more writing and reporting than I’ve done in years for what I humbly think is New Zealand’s best news web site, and restarted my long-dormant comics hobby with Amoeba Adventures in 2020. Writing for this website has turned into my “pressure valve” for writing about things that don’t quite fit into my paid writing niches, a chance to babble on about cool music and comics and movies and sometimes whatever’s going on in my life. 

But yeah, sometimes I get a bit discouraged, when I start to think about how many “readers” to this website may now just be AI bots scraping my actual words for their soulless slop, about how hard it is to make actual human connections online now. Sometimes it feels pointless. Sometimes you want to toss your phone in the ditch and walk away.

The quandary is if you want to be a writer in 2026, you have to use the internet, at least a little bit. So I’m not going anywhere on this space, just yet. 

I took a break for a few months to mull it all over, feeling so very tired of the “enshittification” of online spaces and ideas. I took a little holiday in the real world to remember what it’s like out there and to remind myself that, ultimately, as much as I appreciate every single person who reads my words out there, I write the words for me, because I have to get them out, because being a writer is the only serious job I’ve ever considered in my life since I was about 12 years old and because, I hope, in the end real words by real people are always going to feel more real than all the endless garbage being churned out by opportunists and grifters out there. 

It ain’t a big site, this one, and yet I’ve had a blast writing my little essays here for the past 8 years, despite moments of doubt. 

 “I’m looking to something more than endless scrolling for that dopamine hit,” I wrote back in my first post on this site in 2018. “I’ll focus on what keeps me going in this tattered world.“

Why bother? Well, it beats the alternative, doesn’t it? In a world gone mad, we find the joy where we can, when we can. Onwards!

The last American newspaper I worked for is about to die

I’ve been a journalist for more than 30 years now, and even as I work these days for the website of the national radio station here in New Zealand, a healthy dose of printer’s ink still flows in my veins. 

I read today that the last newspaper I worked for in the US before moving to New Zealand almost 20 years ago is ending its print edition this month, “pivoting to digital” entirely as the kids say. The Roseburg, Oregon News-Review dated back almost 160 years. It’s a damned shame, and is surely likely to lead to more of these cursed “news deserts” that are spreading across America.  

The current management is trumpeting the announcement as “the news is about to become free,” which these days, probably means it’s going to be overwhelmed by videos, AI-generated “content” slop, clickbait and regurgitated press releases. And of course, they’ve sacked the entire newsroom staff. Good luck with that free news, dudes. 

I mourn this, because it doesn’t feel good in an age when the free media is under assault, disinformation is swamping us all, grifting influencers cosplay as journalists and the entire concept of objective truth has slowly crumbled. 

The News-Review was a fine ol’ paper, where I worked from 2002 to 2006 as the features editor. We had a great team there – an editor I really looked up to, who offered reliable, smart advice but also welcomed new ideas, encouraged us when we needed it and dressed us down if we (well, me) deserved it. While there was always a lot of coming and going – the average age of most of the 10 or so reporters was probably about 25 – the N-R felt like a “team,” like all good newsrooms do, covering our little corner of rural Oregon down the road from Portland and Eugene. Journos come and go and you sometimes lose touch but I’ve kept up with a surprising number of the team from the News-Review days – they were generally all good sorts. 

It was, curiously, the first daily newspaper I’d ever worked on, having mostly done my time at weeklies or semi-weeklies. I loved the news buzz, the hustle to put the paper to bed by 10am or so (we were one of those mostly-gone afternoon rags), the juggling of local priorities from irrigation boards and logging companies with state and global news. Often on the weekends I’d act as the editor for the big Sunday paper, at the helm for breaking stories like Ronald Reagan’s death, the War in Iraq and the Space Shuttle Columbia exploding.

I also wrote a lot of long-form features then that were great practice for the eventual raggedy arc of my so-called career ending up at Radio New Zealand – stories I’m still pretty proud of now, like a profile of the local wildlife park veterinarian, an eccentric Russian painter, or interviewing Alice Cooper as he brought his shock-rock act to town. 

Sorry, I won’t be answering any calls at this number any more.

It was a gorgeous place and the town where my wife and I had our child, so Roseburg will always mean something to me, but even then it was also thick with the kind of blinkered conservatism that’s led us firmly into Trump-land, all these years later. The paper’s been bought and sold and staff chipped away over the years since and the paper already cut to barely being printed at all. I’d check in on the website occasionally long after pretty much anyone I knew had left Roseburg, because an old newshound never quite forgets a familiar scent, long after he’s left the country, even. 

The News-Review is hardly the first newspaper I worked at to fold, even – the college town free weekly in Mississippi that broke me into journalism withered away ages ago, another small paper in California faded away, even the big old New York City-produced national magazine I worked only publishes occasional special issues these days.  

It’s not a lot better here in New Zealand, really – journalists have lost jobs, outlets have dried up. I’m very glad to still be in the industry I’m in and at a place I respect, but I do miss the rumble of the presses at the back end of the building, the painstaking proofreading of printouts of your pages, the clamour and rush of daily print deadlines instead of the perpetual motion machine the news is now. 

A newspaper, in its day, provided context and coherence to the swirling world of the day’s news, wrapping it all up in a tidy package with crosswords, Blondie cartoons, Dear Abby, weird classified ads and frequently ridiculous letters to the editor. It was complete, for one day at least. Internet news, as great and useful as it is, somehow still never quite feels like the complete package in the end to me – you just keep scrolling, forever, don’t you? Maybe I’m just a physical media guy to my core.

And for those people in small town Oregon, many of whom probably haven’t read the soon-to-die paper in years and get all their news from their own internet bubbles now – I miss the things they won’t even know they’re missing, in a world without a newspaper. 

Breaking: The never-ending battle against fake AI news

In my day job, a project I’ve been working on for the last couple weeks across both Radio New Zealand and the Australian Associated Press is debunking a slew of “fake” NZ news sites on Facebook. Many of them specialise in taking legitimate work by NZ reporters and running it through AI, stealing other reporters’ work, adding fake AI-generated images or misleading video as they go. One such post included grotesquely using AI to animate a still photo of a dead teenage Mt Maunganui landslide victim.

This slop is everywhere on social media now – literally any time a news event happens, a horde of pages will serve up AI-generated garbage about it instantly, from Australian shark attacks to the arrest of Venezuelan leader Maduro to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Now, smaller pages are spoofing nearly every car crash and weather event that makes the news in New Zealand with AI content.

I was pleased to see my reporting got a lot of attention this week and made appearances on RNZ’s Afternoons and Mediawatch programmes to talk about it some as well in my very un-Kiwi accent. 

Here’s some of what I’ve been working on:

How fake NZ news pages are swamping Facebook with AI slop (RNZ)

RNZ Afternoons with Jesse Mulligan interview with yours truly (RNZ)

Mediawatch: AI feeds fake news flood (the segment starts about 23min, 30sec in)

Fake NZ news page flooding Facebook with AI images (AAP)

NZ ‘media outlet’ misrepresents news with AI images and video (AAP)

Facebook pages peddle AI images of NZ landslide disaster (AAP)

It is depressing – like a lot of people, I think, I’m recoiling more and more from social media and what once seemed to be “fun” diversions, as FB becomes overwhelmed by slop and algorithmic nonsense and loses all its usefulness, X, which I quit long ago, became a Nazi bar, and most other sites are either annoying or infuriating. I even got to say the word “enshittification” on national radio this past week, a phrase which really does seem to sum up the vibe in the room on the internet these days.

My advice is – don’t trust anything you see on social media without verifying it first, and legitimate journalists are still the best source of information out there, not your mates on Facebook. I don’t know if there’s an end in sight to this flood of misinformation that’s reached tsunami heights in the past six years or so, but the most important tool you have to fight against it is your own brain and credulity.

Five years, that’s all we got: Jacinda Ardern and being Prime Minister

There’s something spooky about watching a documentary covering events you lived through and still haven’t quite processed yourself. 

Jacinda Ardern was New Zealand’s leader up until about 2 1/2 years ago, but somehow that already feels like a few centuries ago in the current grim timeline. Watching the excellent, if starry-eyed, new documentary Prime Minister takes us back through the whirlwind of 2017-2023, when New Zealand was often buffeted by a series of tragedies that all felt sadly outside our control.

Prime Minister is a startlingly intimate portrait of the Jacinda years, and what it’s like to be a young pregnant woman suddenly lifted up to the corridors of power. Whether or not you agreed with Ardern’s administration – and it was ultimately as flawed as most governments, in the end, but not as bad as some – Prime Minister is a movie that is somehow bittersweet and optimistic all at the same time. 

So it’s weird watching Prime Minister and seeing the history of your country retold when it feels like it’s all not even quite ended yet, to see everything unfold again as it did in those crazy five years.

I was in the thick of the Ardern years as a journalist, typing away news alerts and quick takes from the day she surprisingly came out on top of government coalition negotiations in 2017. I watched with horror the shocking mosque shootings of Christchurch in 2019, helped cover her massive re-election win in 2020 and watched as Covid crept in and everything in the world seemed to grind to a blurry halt. We journalists waited for the “1pm update” on what the pandemic had to say today, and saw the creeping dissatisfaction grow in some corners.

I watched Parliament’s grounds become occupied by a collection of protesters for weeks in 2022 and I had the curious fortune to be running a live-blog the morning that the police came and that occupation came to a violent, fiery end. For a journalist, the moments when you think, “I’m watching history right now” come with an electric charge.

We’re very much all still living in the societal and cultural upheaval the pandemic left behind and the swamp of populist rants, conspiracy theories and anger-fueled online bile feels like it will never end. Did New Zealand get everything right? Probably not, but the overriding fact is that all the rewriting of history going on at the moment ignores that at the time nobody knew what might happen, and in the end, a whole lot of people could have died in a small island country like ours. Ultimately less than 6000 died of Covid-19 here – while in America, 1.2 million did.

Prime Minister boasts a candid access that it’s hard to imagine a lot of political leaders allowing. Ardern’s partner Clarke shot lots of footage of her over the years, as she sits in bed worn out after long days or works through the exhaustion of pregnancy. Even though I spent so much time covering Ardern and writing about the events of the day, it’s all a very different perspective that sheds new light on the burdens of power and Jacinda’s – perhaps impossible – attempts to remain kind at heart in a world that frowns on that. 

Again, I won’t argue New Zealand was some magical utopia when Jacinda Ardern was in power. But to be honest, a lot of politicians running the world at the moment seem barely human, let alone humane to me. We dehumanise politicians, and Prime Minister aims to correct that. Ardern has been turned into some unrecognisable demon avatar in some corners of NZ to this day. It’s hard to reconcile that with the images of a young mum playing with her daughter we see in Prime Minister. It’s also easy to see why Jacinda quit when she did, having no more petrol in the tank. 

Prime Minister isn’t a deep investigative dive into NZ politics. It’s glossy and aims to make Ardern the hero without really diving into the intricacies of politics here. And yet, in its own way, it feels a bit like an elegy for a lost world. Why would anyone want to be a politician these days? 

Power costs, and in the end, you have to wonder if, in a timeline crowded with blustering authoritarians, grim bottom-liners, hucksters and grifters and outrage merchants, that the eminently human scale of Jacinda’s politics is something we may never see again. 

Meanwhile, elsewhere on the internet…

Golly, but I’ve been busy writing everywhere but this blog lately.

I’ve been doing a lot more assorted fact-checking and explaining work for cash money so it’s time for another roundup of stuff what I wrote:

Just in time for the hopefully good new movie opening this week, I did a recap for Radio New Zealand on Superman’s best (and not so best) moments on screen to date and some comics recommendations!

Everything you need to know about Superman before his latest movie

Over at AAP FactCheck, I did a deep dive into the disturbing and increasingly surreal world of bizarre AI slop infesting your social media feeds. The “conjoined twins celebrity scam” posts are the ones that finally broke my brain for good, I reckon:

Junk accounts serve up fantasy tennis tales

For RNZ, I’ve also done a few long explainer pieces lately:

Did you know US Customs can legally search your phone? Here’s what you need to know about it

And finally pivoting back again to the murky world of AI and how it’s slowly eroding all that is fair and decent on social media, here’s another explainer:

How to tell if an image or video has been created by AI – and if we still can

Featuring my very own test AI-generated slop image that I was particularly proud of:

Don’t always believe your eyes, is the moral of the story.

Unless it’s something on this website, which in that case is totally 100 percent legit and doesn’t need factchecking.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to go and assist in the emergency conjoined twin surgery for my good friend, celebrity Taylor Swift.

How I became a journalist who doesn’t drink coffee

Coffee and journalism generally go together like fish and chips. But somehow, I’m slowly becoming a journalist who doesn’t drink coffee.

Not to get all medical on you, but I’ve had irritating recurring problems with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux or LPR the past year or so, and it’s been increasingly obvious to this middle-aged git that I need to reconsider things I used to eat or drink without even thinking about it. 

Troubling things like raw tomatoes or bacon have slowly slid from my diet, but I was reluctant to give up coffee because it was a habit, and we love our habits. But back in January I made the call to give up coffee and see how I did.

It hasn’t erased the problem, which is irritatingly random at times, but it’s definitely made a little bit of a difference. 

The surprising thing for me is that I haven’t really even missed the actual drink all that much. I had expected coffee having been a regular part of this journo’s diet since about 1990 or so would be like oxygen or sunshine, something I’d wither up and die without. 

But instead, I’ve discovered that I rather enjoy green tea for a caffeine hit, or a can of my once-beloved Pepsi a couple times a week (which also isn’t great for me, admittedly). I have had mornings where the foggy whispering in my brain takes quite a while to recede, but I’ve had other mornings where I felt fairly human from the start. And it’s definitely helped my throat issues.  

I know coffee is a fetish in this problem-plagued world, but the abstinence has made me realise I didn’t really crave the coffee itself. Perhaps it’s because I’ve had more than my share of truly awful coffee – most of the newsrooms in America I worked in over the years specialised in grimy coffee machines exuding a watery brown gruel that probably led to the gradual erosion of my esophagus decades later. Newsrooms, at least in the bad old days, had horrible coffee. Despite that, I used to suck down three, four, five cups a day but for a long time now my max had been two cups, tops.

And of course, if something you’re used to starts to make you feel like garbage, it can take a while to break the habit, but in the end, I didn’t love coffee enough to put up with everything else that came with it for me. 

When I’ve had a truly good coffee, I appreciate the skill that goes into it, but in retrospect, I guess I’ve never really fallen in love with it – more than anything I just liked the caffeine jolt. (I have literally never understood the reason for the existence of decaffeinated coffee. What’s the point?)

I stopped my daily coffee in January and dipped briefly back in a few weeks ago just to see if it really was problematic for me. Both mornings my throat swelled up to the point where I started to wonder if I was actually allergic to the blessed bean now. I don’t think I am, but it was enough to make me think I’d stick to tea, like a good New Zealander, for the duration. 

I can still do journalism without coffee, it turns out – case in point the rather frantic events of Easter Monday when I was running the Radio New Zealand website and about an hour before the scheduled end of my shift, Pope Francis died. Once upon a time I would’ve grabbed a few cups or cracked open some Pepsi to get through it all, but instead I let the adrenaline breaking news buzz – still the best pick-me-up there ever was – carry me through.

We pick up lots of habits in life and then you hit the point where you have to start to give up these habits to ensure an easier go of things. I don’t think I miss my morning cup all that much, but I guess I miss the idea of it. But I’ll get used to it.

Meanwhile, elsewhere on the internet…

So it’s been ten years this month since Netflix streaming came to New Zealand, the tipping point that changed how we watch so-called “TV” forever down here at the bottom of the world. New by me over at Radio New Zealand, a look at how life’s changed in the streaming wave – go read here!

How a decade of Netflix has changed how we watch TV in New Zealand forever

Clippings: Collected Journalism 1994-2024 – Free sample 3!

Hey, it’s your weekly reminder I’ve got a new book out! For the release of my new collection of the so-called ‘best’ of 30 years of journalism, Clippings, every Monday in March I’m spotlighting one of the more than 100 pieces by me gathered up in this hefty tome. I hope you’ll consider grabbing a copy, now available on Amazon as a paperback for a mere US$14.99, or as an e-book download for just US$2.99! 

This one actually comes from right here on this here website back in the long-ago days of 2021. It’s a sample of the ‘Criticism’ section of the book which gathers up piles of pop culture ruminations I’ve done over the years. Inexplicably, this post about Yoko Ono remains one of the most popular I’ve ever done. I’d flatter myself it’s about the quality of my prose, but more likely because I put Yoko Ono and ‘sorry’ in the headline and it’s hitting some Google sweet spot. Sorry, Yoko haters, but this isn’t a piece about Yoko Ono being sorry she broke up the Beatles!

Why I’m sorry I ever laughed at Yoko Ono

Read it right here!

You’ll find this piece and far, far more collecting 30 years of journalism in my new book Clippings: Collected Journalism 1994-2024. Order it today, baby needs a new pair of shoes!